================+==========+==============+===============+=========== EXPERIMENT | |RESULTS BEFORE|NUMBER OF TIMES| RESULTS AND DATE | ANIMAL | TRAINING | PUT THROUGH | AFTER | | | | TRAINING ----------------+----------+--------------+---------------+----------- A. Jan. 22, 1901| No. 1. | 5 F | 10 | 1.00 | | | | 3.00 Jan. 22, 1901| No. 1. | 5 F | 10 | im. | | | | 3.30 Jan. 23, 1901| No. 3. | 5 F | 10 | 3.30 | | 5 F | | B. Jan. 26, 1901| No. 1. | 10 F | 10 and 5 | 10 F 5 F | No. 3. | 5 F | 10 | 5 F | | | 10 | 5 F C. Jan. 27, 1901| No. 1. | 5 F | 10 | 3.00 D. Jan. 27, 1901| No. 1. | 3.20 | 10 | 5 F E. Jan. 26, 1901| No. 3. | 5 F | 5 | 5 F ================+==========+==============+===============+===========
Although, as I noted in the early part of this monograph, there were occasionally phenomena in the general behavior of the monkeys which of themselves impressed one as being suggestive of an ideational life, the general run of their learning apart from the specific experiments described was certainly confined to the association of impulses of their own with certain situations. The following examples will suffice:—
In getting them so that they would let themselves be handled it was of almost no service to _take_ them and feed them while holding them or otherwise make that state pleasant for them. By far the best way is to wait patiently till they do come near, then feed them; wait patiently till they do take hold of your arm, then feed them. If you do take them and hold them partly by force, you must feed them only when they are comparatively still. In short, in taming them one comes unconsciously to adopt the method of rewarding certain of their impulses rather than certain _conditions_ which might be associated in their minds with ideas, had they such.
After No. 1 and No. 3 had both reached a point where both could hardly be gotten to leave me and go back into their cages or down to the floor of the room, where they evidently enjoyed being held by me, they still did not climb upon me. The idea of clinging to me was either absent or impotent to cause them to act. What they did do was, in the case of No. 1, to jump about, pawing around in the air, until I caught an arm or leg, to which stimulus he had by dint of the typical sort of animal association learned to react by jumping to my arm and clinging there; in the case of No. 3, to stand still until I held my arm right in front of him (if he were in his cage) or to come and stand on his hind legs in front of me (if he were out on the floor). In both cases No. 3’s act was one which had been learned by my rewarding his impulses. I often tried, at this period of their intimacy with me, this instructive experiment. The monkey would be clinging to me so that I could hardly tear him away. I would do so, and he would, if dropped loose from me, make no efforts to get back.
I have already mentioned my failure to get the animals to put out their right hands through the netting after they had long done so with their left hands. With No. 3 I tried putting my fingers through and poking the arm out and then making the movement with it. He profited little if any by this tuition. Had I somehow induced him to do it himself, a few trials would have been sufficient to get the habit well under way.
Monkey No. 1 apparently enjoyed scratching himself. Among the stimuli which served to set off this act of scratching was the irritation from tobacco smoke. If any one would blow smoke in No. 1’s face, he would blink his eyes and scratch himself, principally in the back. After a time he got in the habit of coming to the front of his cage when any one was smoking and making such movements and sounds as in his experience had attracted attention and caused the smoker to blow in his face. He was often given a lighted cigar or cigarette to test him for imitation. He formed the habit of rubbing it on his back. After doing so he would scratch himself with great vigor and zest. He came to do this always when the proper object was given him. I have recounted all this to show that the monkey enjoyed scratching himself. _Yet he apparently never scratched himself except in response to some sensory stimulus._ He was apparently incapable of thinking ‘scratch’ and so doing. Yet the act was quite capable of association with circumstances with which as a matter of hereditary organization it had no connection. For by taking a certain well-defined position in front of his cage and feeding him whenever he did scratch himself I got him to always scratch within a few seconds after I took that position.
